Resources

Writing and research

Our approach rests on published work and on research done in the field. Here is where to read more.

On the AEA365 blog

Recent writing

AEA365 is the daily blog of the American Evaluation Association. These posts are listed from newest to oldest. Each link opens the post on the AEA365 site.

Coming soon

  • Book chapter · Forthcoming

    Gestalt Empowerment Evaluation: A Culturally Responsive AI-Driven Evaluation Approach

    David Fetterman and Paul St. Roseman

    To appear in the Handbook of Culturally Responsive Evaluation and Culturally Responsive Research. It gives the full statement of the method, its roots, and the steps for taking up AI.

Dr. St. Roseman's research focus

How evaluation builds learning and leadership

Dr. St. Roseman's research examines how evaluation capacity building shapes the people who take part in it. By routinely reviewing published case studies alongside the context of his work in the field, he has developed a framework that tracks growth along three paths and across three areas.

Three paths of growth

  • Formative. Plan the work and check readiness.
  • Implementation. Do the work and reflect on it.
  • Decision making. Use what was learned to decide and adjust.

Three areas where growth shows up

  • Evaluation capacity building
  • Leadership development
  • Organizational learning culture

The paths look like a straight line, but in practice they are fluid and they repeat. The framework can help: (a) check an organization's evaluation skill, (b) track growth during an evaluation, and (c) look at long-term effects.

What is being learned from the research and practice

"[Evaluation capacity building] capacity to influence stakeholder development is strengthened when evaluation efforts are professionally relevant and provide increased opportunities for participation across an organization."

Stated another way, people grow most when the work matters to their jobs and many of them take part.

"Additionally the benefits of [evaluation capacity building] efforts deepen when participants are motivated, emotionally connected, and trusting of the experience."

Trust and motivation are part of the method, not extras.

"Across the data there is corroboration that newly developed [evaluation capacity building] processes and skills can be difficult to sustain and integrate within an organization."

This is why we favor longer projects that build in workshops, coaching, and support.

His research also changed the question it set out to answer. In Dr. St. Roseman's words, it shifted the question from "Is evaluation capacity building impactful?" to "In what ways is evaluation capacity building impactful?"

Earlier work

  • Dissertation · Mills College · 2015

    A Case Study of Evaluation Capacity Building's Influence on Stakeholder Learning and Leadership Development

    Paul St. Roseman, Ed.D.

    Available on request.

  • Presentation · American Evaluation Association · 2009

    Hidden Possibilities

    Paul St. Roseman

    A look back at one evaluator's work helping grassroots community groups build, use, and keep their own evaluation systems. Available on request.

Want to learn more?

Ask us for a copy of any of these, or for a conversation about your work.

Contact us